Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2025-47285 — vyper

🟢 CVSS 2.0 — Low ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-691 NVD
2.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Vyper's concat() builtin may elide side-effects for zero-length arguments

Impact

concat() may skip evaluation of side effects when the length of an argument is zero. this is due to a fastpath in the implementation which skips evaluation of argument expressions when their length is zero:

https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L560-L562

in practice, it would be very unusual in user code to construct zero-length bytestrings using an expression with side-effects, since zero-length bytestrings are typically constructed with the empty literal b""; the only way to construct an empty bytestring which has side effects would be with the ternary operator introduced in v0.3.8, e.g. b"" if self.do_some_side_effect() else b"".

the following example demonstrates how the issue would look in user code

```vyper

counter: public(uint256)

@external

def test() -> Bytes[256]:

a: Bytes[256] = concat(b"" if self.sideeffect() else b"", b"aaaa")

return a

def sideeffect() -> bool:

self.counter += 1

return True

```

the severity assigned is low, since, as mentioned, this would be a very unusual pattern in user-code.

Patches

fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4644

Workarounds

don't have side effects in expressions which construct zero-length bytestrings.

References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

Weakness class

CVE-2025-47285 is classified as CWE-691: Insufficient Control Flow Management. The code does not sufficiently manage its control flow during execution, creating conditions in which the control flow can be modified in unexpected ways.

Affected software

CVE-2025-47285 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • unknown
  • vyper

Timeline and source

Published on 15 May 2025 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com

Other advisories for this package

unknown has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-691: Insufficient Control Flow Management) in other software:

Details

Severity Low
CVSS Score 2.0
CVSS Vector N/A
CWE CWE-691
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-05-15
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
unknown
vyper

Similar Threats

Free Vulnerability Check

Is your site affected by CVE-2025-47285?

BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against CVE-2025-47285 and other known CVE records.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2025