Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2025-47774 — vyper

🟢 CVSS 2.0 — Low ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-691 NVD
2.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Vyper's slice() may elide side-effects when output length is 0

Impact

the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped:

https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319

the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:

https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191

the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).

the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code

```vyper

counter: public(uint256)

@external

def test() -> Bytes[10]:

b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)

return b

def side_effect() -> uint256:

self.counter += 1

return 0

```

the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.

Patches

the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.

Workarounds

_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_

References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

Weakness class

CVE-2025-47774 is classified as CWE-691: Insufficient Control Flow Management. The code does not sufficiently manage its control flow during execution, creating conditions in which the control flow can be modified in unexpected ways.

Affected software

CVE-2025-47774 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • unknown
  • vyper

Timeline and source

Published on 15 May 2025 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com

Other advisories for this package

unknown has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-691: Insufficient Control Flow Management) in other software:

Details

Severity Low
CVSS Score 2.0
CVSS Vector N/A
CWE CWE-691
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-05-15
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
unknown
vyper

Similar Threats

Free Vulnerability Check

Is your site affected by CVE-2025-47774?

BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against CVE-2025-47774 and other known CVE records.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2025