Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-33676 — vikunja

🟡 CVSS 6.5 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-863 NVD
6.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Vikunja has Cross-Project Information Disclosure via Task Relations — Missing Authorization Check on Related Task Read

Summary

When the Vikunja API returns tasks, it populates the related_tasks field with full task objects for all related tasks without checking whether the requesting user has read permission on those tasks' projects. An authenticated user who can read a task that has cross-project relations will receive full details (title, description, due dates, priority, percent completion, project ID, etc.) of tasks in projects they have no access to.

Details

The vulnerability is in addRelatedTasksToTasks() at pkg/models/tasks.go:496-548. This function is called by addMoreInfoToTasks() (line 773) during every task read operation — both project task listings (GET /api/v1/projects/{id}/views/{id}/tasks) and single task reads (GET /api/v1/tasks/{id}).

The function fetches all related tasks directly from the database without any permission filtering:

```go

// pkg/models/tasks.go:496-548

func addRelatedTasksToTasks(s *xorm.Session, taskIDs []int64, taskMap map[int64]*Task, a web.Auth) (err error) {

relatedTasks := []*TaskRelation{}

err = s.In("task_id", taskIDs).Find(&relatedTasks)

// ...

fullRelatedTasks := make(map[int64]*Task)

err = s.In("id", relatedTaskIDs).Find(&fullRelatedTasks) // Line 514: NO permission check

// ...

for _, rt := range relatedTasks {

// Directly adds to response without checking if user can read the related task

taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind] = append(

taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind], otherTask)

}

}

```

The a web.Auth parameter is received but only used for determining favorites (line 519), never for access control on the related tasks themselves.

In contrast, addBucketsToTasks() (line 550+) in the same file correctly filters enrichment data by calling getAllRawProjects(s, a, ...) to scope results to projects the requesting user can access.

While task relation creation properly enforces authorization (task_relation_permissions.go:32-52 checks write access on the base task and read access on the other task), the relation display path does not re-check permissions for the current reader. This means a privileged user can create a relation that then leaks data to all other users who can read the base task.

PoC

Setup: Two users (User A, User B), two projects (Project-Shared, Project-Private).

  • User A has access to both projects.
  • User B has access only to Project-Shared.
  • Task 1 exists in Project-Shared, Task 2 exists in Project-Private.

Step 1: User A creates a relation between the two tasks

```bash

# As User A (who has access to both projects)

curl -X PUT "http://localhost:3456/api/v1/tasks/TASK1_ID/relations" \

-H "Authorization: Bearer USER_A_TOKEN" \

-H "Content-Type: application/json" \

-d '{"other_task_id": TASK2_ID, "relation_kind": "related"}'

```

Expected: 201 Created (User A has write on Task 1, read on Task 2).

Step 2: User B reads tasks from the shared project

```bash

# As User B (who has NO access to Project-Private)

curl "http://localhost:3456/api/v1/projects/PROJECT_SHARED_ID/views/VIEW_ID/tasks" \

-H "Authorization: Bearer USER_B_TOKEN"

```

Expected: Task 1 should be returned, but related_tasks should NOT include Task 2.

Actual result: The response includes Task 1 with the related_tasks field containing the full Task 2 object, including its title, description, due_date, priority, percent_done, project_id, and other metadata — despite User B having no access to Project-Private.

Impact

  • Information disclosure: Any authenticated user can read the full metadata of tasks in projects they do not have access to, as long as a relation exists from a task they can read.
  • Leaked fields include: title, description, due dates, start dates, priority, percent completion, project ID, hex color, task index, done status, repeat configuration, cover image attachment ID, and creation/update timestamps.
  • Project structure disclosure: The project_id field reveals the existence and IDs of private projects.
  • No user interaction required: Once a privileged user creates a cross-project relation (which is intentionally allowed), the data leak is automatic for all readers of the base task.
  • Blast radius: Affects all Vikunja instances with cross-project task relations. In multi-tenant or team environments where projects have different access scopes, this undermines project-level access control.

Recommended Fix

Filter related tasks by the requesting user's read permissions before adding them to the response. In addRelatedTasksToTasks(), after fetching full task objects, check that the user can read each related task's project:

```go

func addRelatedTasksToTasks(s *xorm.Session, taskIDs []int64, taskMap map[int64]*Task, a web.Auth) (err error) {

relatedTasks := []*TaskRel

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity none, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: None.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-33676 is classified as CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization. An authorisation check runs but reaches the wrong conclusion, permitting actions it should refuse.

Affected software

CVE-2026-33676 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • code.vikunja.io/api
  • vikunja (fixed in 2.2.1)

Timeline and source

Published on 26 March 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
vikunja.io (Web)

Other advisories for this package

code.vikunja.io/api has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization) in other software:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 6.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CWE CWE-863
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-03-26
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-03-26

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
code.vikunja.io/api
vikunja 2.2.1

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in vikunja

CVE-2026-33676 is rated CVSS 6.5 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026