Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-42541 — kubewarden-controller

🟡 CVSS 4.3 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-862 NVD
4.3
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Kubewarden vulnerable to RBAC Reconnaissance via unchecked can_i host capability call

Impact

Kubewarden is a policy engine for Kubernetes. Kubewarden cluster operators can grant permissions to users to deploy namespaced AdmissionPolicies and AdmissionPolicyGroups in their Namespaces. One of Kubewarden promises is that configured users can deploy namespaced policies in a safe manner, without privilege escalation.

An attacker with privileged AdmissionPolicy or AdmissionPolicyGroup create permissions (which isn't the default) can craft a policy that makes use of the can_i host callback. The callback issues a SubjectAccessReview (SAR) requests to enumerate RBAC permissions of any user or service account across the cluster. Three operations on the host capabilities kubewarden/kubernetes binding enforce the context-aware allow-list via can_access_kubernetes_resource():

  • list_resources_by_namespace
  • list_resources_all
  • get_resource

However, can_i does not perform that check and forwards the request directly to the callback handler, which executes a real SubjectAccessReview using policy-server privileges. This creates a policy-level authorization gap: can_i is effectively usable even when the policy has no context-aware resource grant.

This is an information disclosure / reconnaissance issue, and not direct workload data exfiltration. The attacker learns permission information, such as whether specific service accounts can "get secrets", "create pods", or "bind clusterroles" in chosen namespaces.

Patches

Cluster Operators, if providing their users with privileges to deploy AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups (which isn't the default), must then also deploy PolicyServers with reduced permissions for host capability calls. This includes the PolicyServer default.

For that, make use of the new feature in v1.35:

  • For custom PolicyServers: Set the new PolicyServer.spec.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities , for example to an empty list [] which doesn't allow any capability.
  • For the default PolicyServer, set the .Values.policyServer.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities , for example to an empty list [] which doesn't allow any capability.

Also, if needed, they must ensure that those namespaced AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups are scheduled in the PolicyServers with reduced permissions.

For that, they could make use of the new [ns-policyserver-mapper](https://artifacthub.io/packages/kubewarden/kubewarden-policy-library/ns-policyserver-mapper) policy, their own policy or other means, such as GitOps.

See: https://docs.kubewarden.io/howtos/policy-servers/namespaced-policies-capabilities

Workarounds

Cluster Operators can opt for:

  • Not allowing users to create namespaced policies (AdmissionPolicies, AdmissionPolicyGroups).
  • Removing SubjectAccessReview "create" permissions for the PolicyServer ServiceAccount RBAC being used, in custom PolicyServers and the PolicyServer default.

Resources

  • Code changes, with new security feature: https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/pull/1693
  • Documentation changes: https://github.com/kubewarden/docs/pull/737
  • Explained new feature on 1.35.0
  • Updated Threat model assessment

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity none, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Integrity impact: None.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-42541 is classified as CWE-862: Missing Authorization. No authorisation check is performed before carrying out a restricted action.

Affected software

CVE-2026-42541 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 25 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Advisory)
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Fix)
github.com (Web)

Other advisories for this package

github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-862: Missing Authorization) in other software:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 4.3
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CWE CWE-862
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-06-25
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-25

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller
unknown

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in kubewarden-controller

CVE-2026-42541 is rated CVSS 4.3 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026