Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-44305 — lemur

🟡 CVSS 6.8 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-295 NVD
6.8
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Lemur: LDAP Authentication Globally Disables TLS Certificate Verification When LDAP_USE_TLS Is Enabled

Description

Overview

When LDAP TLS is enabled (LDAP_USE_TLS = True), Lemur's LDAP authentication module unconditionally disables TLS certificate verification at the global ldap module level. This allows a man-in-the-middle attacker positioned between Lemur and the LDAP server to intercept all authentication credentials.

Vulnerable Code

Location: lemur/auth/ldap.py, _bind() method, line ~172

```python

if self.ldap_use_tls:

ldap.set_option(ldap.OPT_X_TLS_REQUIRE_CERT, ldap.OPT_X_TLS_NEVER)

```

Key issues:

1. ldap.set_option() is a global call (as opposed to self.ldap_client.set_option()), meaning it disables TLS verification for the entire Python process, not just this connection

2. OPT_X_TLS_NEVER means no certificate validation is performed whatsoever — self-signed, expired, wrong hostname, and revoked certificates are all silently accepted

3. There is no configuration option to override this behavior — TLS verification is always disabled when TLS is enabled

Impact

A network-positioned attacker (man-in-the-middle) between Lemur and the LDAP server can:

  • Intercept all LDAP credentials (usernames and plaintext passwords) for every user who authenticates
  • Modify LDAP responses to inject arbitrary group memberships, granting admin access
  • Compromise the entire PKI infrastructure managed by Lemur, since authentication controls access to certificates and private keys

This is particularly severe because Lemur is a certificate management system — the tool designed to manage TLS security is itself vulnerable to a TLS attack.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Deploy Lemur with LDAP TLS enabled:

```python

LDAP_AUTH = True

LDAP_USE_TLS = True

LDAP_BIND_URI = "ldaps://dc.corp.example.com"

```

2. Intercept the LDAP connection using a TLS proxy (e.g., mitmproxy or stunnel):

```bash

# Generate a self-signed certificate

openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout mitm.key -out mitm.crt -days 1 -nodes -subj "/CN=mitm"

# Proxy LDAP traffic

stunnel -d 0.0.0.0:636 -r real-ldap-server:636 -p mitm.pem

```

3. Point Lemur's LDAP_BIND_URI at the proxy (or perform ARP spoofing/DNS hijacking)

4. Observe that Lemur connects without any certificate verification error

5. All credentials are visible in the proxy's TLS session

Remediation

Remove the global TLS verification bypass and default to strict verification:

```python

if self.ldap_use_tls:

# Use instance-level option, not global

self.ldap_client.set_option(ldap.OPT_X_TLS_REQUIRE_CERT, ldap.OPT_X_TLS_DEMAND)

self.ldap_client.set_option(ldap.OPT_PROTOCOL_VERSION, 3)

if self.ldap_cacert_file:

self.ldap_client.set_option(ldap.OPT_X_TLS_CACERTFILE, self.ldap_cacert_file)

```

If backward compatibility is needed, make it configurable with a secure default:

```python

tls_require_cert = current_app.config.get("LDAP_TLS_REQUIRE_CERT", ldap.OPT_X_TLS_DEMAND)

self.ldap_client.set_option(ldap.OPT_X_TLS_REQUIRE_CERT, tls_require_cert)

```

Resources

  • CWE-295: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/295.html
  • python-ldap TLS documentation: https://www.python-ldap.org/en/python-ldap-3.4.0/reference/ldap.html#tls-options

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached from an adjacent network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

  • Attack vector: Adjacent network — the attacker has to sit on the same local or logical network.
  • Attack complexity: High — the attacker first has to win a race, learn a secret or otherwise prepare the target.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-44305 is classified as CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation. A TLS certificate is accepted without proper verification, so a man-in-the-middle can present their own.

Affected software

CVE-2026-44305 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • lemur (fixed in 1.9.0)
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 6 May 2026 and last revised on 13 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
www.python-ldap.org (Web)

Other advisories for this package

lemur has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation) in other software:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 6.8
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE CWE-295
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-06
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-13
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
lemur 1.9.0
unknown

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in lemur

CVE-2026-44305 is rated CVSS 6.8 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026