free5GC's PCF npcf-smpolicycontrol POST /sm-policies panics on downstream UDR/OpenAPI 404 via nil pointer dereference
free5GC's PCF POST /npcf-smpolicycontrol/v1/sm-policies handler (HandleCreateSmPolicyRequest) panics with a nil-pointer dereference when a downstream OpenAPI consumer call (UDR lookup) returns 404 Not Found and the consumer wrapper returns err != nil together with a nil response struct. The handler logs the OpenAPI error and continues executing instead of returning, then dereferences the nil response struct on a subsequent line and panics. Gin recovery converts the panic into HTTP 500, so a single attacker-shaped POST returns 500 instead of a clean 4xx whenever the downstream lookup fails. The PCF process keeps running.
The trigger is a single POST containing input that causes the downstream UDR lookup to fail (e.g. an unknown DNN). In v4.2.1 this endpoint is also reachable WITHOUT an Authorization header because the PCF Npcf_SMPolicyControl route group is mounted without inbound auth middleware (see free5gc/free5gc#844). So in the validation lab the trigger is fully unauthenticated.
Validated against the PCF container in the official Docker compose lab.
v4.1.0 (originally reported on v4.1.0; same defect present in v4.2.1)http://10.100.200.9:8000Vulnerable handler path (paraphrased from the captured stack trace):
```
[INFO][PCF][SMpolicy] Handle CreateSmPolicy
[ERRO][PCF][Consumer] openapi error: 404, Not Found
[ERRO][PCF][GIN] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.(*Processor).HandleCreateSmPolicyRequest
/go/src/free5gc/NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/smpolicy.go:82 +0x562
github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi.(*Server).HTTPCreateSMPolicy
/go/src/free5gc/NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/api_smpolicy.go:86 +0x405
```
The handler's UDR-failure branch logs the OpenAPI error but does not return; the next line dereferences the nil response struct.
Code evidence (paths in free5gc/pcf):
NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/smpolicy.go:82NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/api_smpolicy.go:86Reproduced end-to-end against the running PCF at http://10.100.200.9:8000.
Send a single POST whose dnn is unknown to UDR -- this drives the downstream OpenAPI call to return 404 Not Found, which then triggers the nil-deref panic:
```
curl -sS -X POST 'http://10.100.200.9:8000/npcf-smpolicycontrol/v1/sm-policies' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"supi":"imsi-208930000000003",
"pduSessionId":1,
"dnn":"internet-bad",
"sliceInfo":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},
"servingNetwork":{"mcc":"208","mnc":"93"},
"accessType":"3GPP_ACCESS",
"notificationUri":"http://smf.free5gc.org:8000/npcf-smpolicycontrol/v1/notify"
}'
```
Observed response: HTTP 500 Internal Server Error with empty body.
PCF container logs show:
```
[INFO][PCF][SMpolicy] Handle CreateSmPolicy
[ERRO][PCF][Consumer] openapi error: 404, Not Found
[ERRO][PCF][GIN] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
...HandleCreateSmPolicyRequest at smpolicy.go:82...
```
The Gin recovery middleware catches the panic (the captured stack trace runs inside ginRecover.func2.1), so the PCF process keeps serving other requests; the realized impact is per-request HTTP 500 on this endpoint whenever the downstream lookup fails.
NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) caused by improper handling of an exceptional branch (CWE-754): the UDR-failure branch logs the OpenAPI error but does not return, then dereferences the nil response struct. The intended behavior is to return a controlled 4xx/5xx ProblemDetails and stop processing.
Gin recovery catches the panic, so the PCF process is NOT killed and other endpoints continue serving. The realized impact is per-request: any unauthenticated POST that drives the downstream UDR lookup to a 404 returns HTTP 500 (with empty body and a stack trace in PCF logs) instead of a controlled error response.
No Confidentiality impact (the response is 500 with empty body). No persistent Integrity impact (the panic happens before any state mutation). Availability impact is limited to per-request degradation. The endpoint remains reachable to unauthenticated attackers via the route-group auth gap separately tracked in free5gc/free5gc#844.
Affected: free5gc v4.2.1 (originally reported against v4.1.0; same defect present).
Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/803
Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/pcf/pull/62
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.
The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVE-2026-44316 is classified as CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. A pointer that can be null is used without a check, crashing the process.
CVE-2026-44316 is recorded against 2 packages.
Published on 27 May 2026 and last revised on 17 June 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
free5gc has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:
These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference) in other software:
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| free5gc | — | 4.2.2 |
| github.com/free5gc/pcf | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
Exploit Protection
CVE-2026-44316 carries CVSS 8.0 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2026-44316 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.
Stay up to date with the latest from Boteraser.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.
Service URL: developers.cloudflare.com (opens in a new window)
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
These cookies are used for managing login functionality on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
You can find more information in our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.