Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-44320 — free5gc

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ⚠️ Exploit Public CWE-306 NVD
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

free5GC's NEF nnef-callback route group is unauthenticated; forged callback requests are accepted into the processing path

Summary

free5GC's NEF mounts the nnef-callback route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token) is enough to reach the SMF-callback handler -- the callback body is parsed and dispatched into NEF business logic instead of being rejected at the auth boundary. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. NEF does not authenticate the producer NF identity before processing callback content; if an attacker can guess or obtain a valid NotifId, this missing auth boundary lets forged callbacks act on real subscription state. The route group is also reachable even when the runtime ServiceList does not declare it (it lists only nnef-pfdmanagement and nnef-oam).

Details

Validated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab.

  • Running Docker image: free5gc/nef:v4.2.1
  • Docker validation date: 2026-03-11

NEF advertises OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true, yet the nnef-callback route group is mounted with no inbound auth middleware. The API layer reads the raw request body and deserializes it before any auth check, then the processor looks up subscription state by NotifId.

Code evidence (paths in free5gc/nef):

  • Callback route group mounted without auth middleware: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:64
  • Callback route exposed at /notification/smf: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_callback.go:13
  • API layer reads raw request bytes and deserializes them before any auth check: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_callback.go:23
  • Processor looks up the subscription by NotifId: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/callback.go:13
  • NEF context only exposes outbound token acquisition (GetTokenCtx); there is no inbound authorization path: NFs/nef/internal/context/nef_context.go:153
  • Config validation only allows nnef-pfdmanagement and nnef-oam: NFs/nef/pkg/factory/config.go:126

PoC

Reproduced against the running NEF at http://10.100.200.19:8000 using a fabricated bearer token.

Send a forged callback request:

```

curl -i \

-H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \

-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \

--data '{"notifId":"forged-notif","eventNotifs":[]}' \

http://10.100.200.19:8000/nnef-callback/v1/notification/smf

```

Observed output:

```

HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found

{"title":"Data not found","status":404,"detail":"Subscription is not found"}

```

The 404 is positive auth-bypass evidence: the request was parsed and dispatched into the callback business handler instead of being rejected at the auth boundary. NEF container logs (docker logs nef) confirm the callback handler was reached:

```

[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] SmfNotification - NotifId[forged-notif]

[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 404 | POST | /nnef-callback/v1/notification/smf

```

Impact

Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the NEF nnef-callback SBI route group. This is the trusted ingestion point for SMF -> NEF notifications. The defect is route-group-scoped: there is no auth middleware on the group at all, so every callback endpoint inside this group inherits the missing inbound auth boundary. Severity is scored against the route group's intended capability surface (consume SMF notifications and mutate NEF / downstream subscription state), NOT against the specific PoC where the chosen NotifId happened to be invalid.

Any party that can reach NEF on the SBI can:

  • Submit forged SMF callbacks to NEF anonymously, with body content fully controlled by the attacker.
  • Reach NEF callback business logic without proving producer NF identity, so any attacker who can guess or obtain a valid NotifId can deliver forged event notifications against real subscription state -- corrupting AF traffic-influence / PFD-management subscription views and the downstream SMF/UPF policy decisions that depend on them.
  • Hit any future callback added behind this same route group anonymously, because the auth boundary does not exist for this group.

The nnef-callback route group is also reachable even when the runtime ServiceList does not declare it, so operators relying on ServiceList to disable the service do not actually get that protection.

Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.

Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/860

Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/24

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity low, availability low.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-44320 is classified as CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function. A sensitive function can be reached without authenticating at all.

Affected software

CVE-2026-44320 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • free5gc (fixed in 4.2.2)
  • github.com/free5gc/nef

Timeline and source

Published on 27 May 2026 and last revised on 17 June 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com

Other advisories for this package

free5gc has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CWE CWE-306
Public Exploit ⚠️ Yes
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-27
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
free5gc 4.2.2
github.com/free5gc/nef

Similar Threats

Exploit Protection

Are you running free5gc?

CVE-2026-44320 carries CVSS 8.0 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2026-44320 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026