Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-56396 — phpmyfaq

🟠 CVSS 8.8 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-832 NVD
8.8
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

phpMyFAQ has an incomplete fix for GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3 — editUser() and updateUserRights() lack authorization guards

Advisory / Disclosure

# phpMyFAQ 4.1.3 — incomplete fix for the admin-API IDOR/privilege-escalation class

Target: thorsten/phpMyFAQ (composer: thorsten/phpmyfaq, phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq)

Affected: <= 4.1.3 (the 4.1.3 security fix is incomplete; siblings remain)

Class: CWE-862 Missing Authorization / CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management / CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Methodology: M1 incomplete-fix audit (sibling-walk of the 4.1.3 fix for GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3)

Severity: High — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 8.8 (same class as the parent CVE)

Summary

phpMyFAQ 4.1.3 fixed GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3 ("IDOR Account Takeover") by adding actor-authorization guards to UserController::overwritePassword(). The patch establishes a new invariant, stated in its own code comments:

> "Only SuperAdmins may change other users' [attributes]. Self-service is

> always allowed." and "a non-SuperAdmin must never be able to alter a

> SuperAdmin or protected account."

That invariant is not enforced on two sibling endpoints in the *same file*, which the 4.1.3 fix left unchanged, and which carry the identical "user-controlled userIdgetUserById() → privileged mutation" primitive — but with a strictly more dangerous sink:

| Endpoint | Route | Sink | Guard in 4.1.3 |

|----------|-------|------|----------------|

| overwritePassword() | admin/api/user/overwrite-password | changePassword() | isSelf + isSuperAdmin + target-protection (patched) |

| editUser() | admin/api/user/edit | setSuperAdmin((bool)$req.is_superadmin) | none (only userHasPermission(USER_EDIT)) |

| updateUserRights() | admin/api/user/update-rights | grantUserRight($req.userId, …) | none (only userHasPermission(USER_EDIT)) |

A logged-in administrator holding the delegable edit_user right — but not SuperAdmin — can therefore:

1. Set their own (or anyone's) is_superadmin flag to true via admin/api/user/editfull privilege escalation to SuperAdmin.

2. Grant arbitrary rights to any account via admin/api/user/update-rights.

This is exactly the threat model the parent advisory (GHSA-xvp4) calls out: "organizations with multiple admin users where not all should have SuperAdmin access."

Anchors (upstream tag 4.1.3)

  • phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/UserController.php
  • editUser() lines 419-476; user-controlled userId at :433, user-controlled is_superadmin at :443, sink

$user >setSuperAdmin((bool)$isSuperAdmin) at :463. Only gate: userHasPermission(PermissionType::USER_EDIT) at :422.

  • updateUserRights() lines 482-520; userId at :496, sink grantUserRight($userId, …) at :511. Only gate at :485.
  • overwritePassword() lines 419… → 228-288; the patched guards at: 254-260 and: 269-273.
  • phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/AbstractController.phpuserHasPermission() :221-227 (checks one right only; non SuperAdmins can hold it).
  • phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/User.phpsetSuperAdmin() :950-962 (UPDATE faquser SET is_superadmin=… WHERE user_id=…, no guard); isSuperAdmin() :942-945.
  • phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Permission/BasicPermission.phphasPermission() :95-112 (SuperAdmin short-circuits true, else checkUserRight).

Evidence snapshots in this folder:

advisory/fix-diff-4.1.2-to-4.1.3.txt (proves the fix touched only overwritePassword/deleteUser) and advisory/vulnerable-siblings-4.1.3.txt (the two unguarded methods as shipped). git diff 4.1.2 4.1.3 shows no change to editUser, updateUserRights, setSuperAdmin, or grantUserRight.

Proof of Concept

poc/poc.php (run log: poc/run-log.txt). Dependency-free: it builds phpMyFAQ's real schema (copied verbatim from

src/phpMyFAQ/Instance/Database/Sqlite3.php) and executes the verbatim SQL that the shipped 4.1.3 methods run —setSuperAdmin (UPDATE), grantUserRight (INSERT), and the real hasPermission / checkUserRight / getRightId queries — to prove the primitive:

  • Seeds a SuperAdmin (admin, id=1) and a non-SuperAdmin admin (editor, id=2) granted only add_user/edit_user/delete_user.
  • Control: the patched overwritePassword guard blocks editor changing the SuperAdmin (id=1) — confirms the fix works *there*.
  • Exploit 1: editor (non-SuperAdmin, passes userHasPermission(edit_user)) flips their own is_superadmin 0→1 → SuperAdmin. VULNERABLE.
  • Exploit 2: editor grants the editconfig right via updateUserRights. VULNERABLE.

Run:

```sh

php poc/poc.php # -> RESULT: VULNERABLE ... EXIT 0

```

PoC scope (honest)

The PoC exercises the privilege-escalation primitive (the unguarded sinks + the real authorization-resolution logic) against the real schema. The full HTTP exploit additionally requires an authenticated admin session an

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-56396 is classified as CWE-832: Unlock of a Resource that is not Locked. The product attempts to unlock a resource that is not locked.

Affected software

CVE-2026-56396 is recorded against 3 packages.

  • phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq (fixed in 4.1.4)
  • thorsten/phpmyfaq (fixed in 4.1.4)
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 26 June 2026 and last revised on 8 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)

Other advisories for this package

phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-832: Unlock of a Resource that is not Locked) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.8
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE CWE-832
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-06-26
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-08
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq 4.1.4
thorsten/phpmyfaq 4.1.4
unknown

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is phpmyfaq part of your stack?

CVE-2026-56396 is rated CVSS 8.8 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026