🛡️ CVE-2026-67315 — axios
Description
Axios: NO_PROXY bypass for 0.0.0.0 local addresses in axios
Summary
Axios versions containing lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js do not treat 0.0.0.0 as a local address when evaluating NO_PROXY rules. In Node.js applications that use HTTP_PROXY or HTTPS_PROXY together with NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 or similar, a request to http://0.0.0.0:<port>/ can be routed through the configured proxy instead of bypassing it.
The issue is exploitable when an attacker can influence the axios request URL or a followed redirect target, and when the proxy can reach or relay 0.0.0.0 to local services. This is a Node.js runtime proxy-routing issue, not a browser, install-time, or development-tooling issue.
Impact
Applications are affected when all of the following are true:
- The application runs axios in Node.js with the HTTP adapter.
- The process uses environment proxy variables such as
HTTP_PROXYorHTTPS_PROXY. - The process uses
NO_PROXYentries such aslocalhost,127.0.0.1, or::1to keep local traffic out of the proxy path. - Attacker-controlled input can influence the request URL or redirect target.
- The configured proxy does not reject
0.0.0.0and can reach the local destination.
For plain HTTP targets, the proxy can receive the full request URL, headers, and body, and may be able to observe the local service response. HTTPS targets are less exposed because axios uses CONNECT tunneling in current versions.
Affected Functionality
Affected functionality is limited to environment-derived proxy selection in the Node HTTP adapter:
lib/adapters/http.jscallsgetProxyForUrl(location)and thenshouldBypassProxy(location)before applying the proxy.lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.jsnormalizes and comparesNO_PROXYentries.- Explicit caller-provided
config.proxyremains trusted caller configuration. - Browser, React Native, XHR, and fetch adapter behavior are not affected.
Technical Details
lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js defines local loopback equivalence through isLoopback(). The current implementation recognizes localhost, IPv4 127.0.0.0/8, IPv6 ::1, and IPv4-mapped loopback forms, but it does not include 0.0.0.0.
At lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js:176, axios treats two hosts as matching when both are considered loopback:
```js
return hostname === entryHost || (isLoopback(hostname) && isLoopback(entryHost));
```
Because isLoopback('0.0.0.0') returns false, NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 does not match http://0.0.0.0:<port>/. lib/adapters/http.js:185-193 then applies the environment proxy.
Proof of Concept of Attack
```js
import http from 'http';
import axios from './index.js';
const listen = (handler, host = '127.0.0.1') =>
new Promise((resolve) => {
const server = http.createServer(handler);
server.listen(0, host, () => resolve(server));
});
const close = (server) => new Promise((resolve) => server.close(resolve));
const origin = await listen((req, res) => res.end('origin'), '0.0.0.0');
let proxyRequests = 0;
const proxy = await listen((req, res) => {
proxyRequests += 1;
res.end('proxied');
});
process.env.http_proxy = http://127.0.0.1:${proxy.address().port};
process.env.HTTP_PROXY = process.env.http_proxy;
process.env.no_proxy = 'localhost,127.0.0.1,::1';
process.env.NO_PROXY = process.env.no_proxy;
try {
const direct = await axios.get(http://127.0.0.1:${origin.address().port}/);
const zero = await axios.get(http://0.0.0.0:${origin.address().port}/);
console.log({ direct: direct.data, zero: zero.data, proxyRequests });
} finally {
await close(origin);
await close(proxy);
}
```
Expected safe behavior: both 127.0.0.1 and 0.0.0.0 bypass the proxy when the NO_PROXY policy is intended to cover local destinations.
Observed behavior: 127.0.0.1 bypasses the proxy, while 0.0.0.0 is sent through the proxy.
Workarounds
- Add
0.0.0.0explicitly toNO_PROXYwhere local addresses must bypass proxies. - Reject or normalize
0.0.0.0in application URL validation before calling axios. - Set
proxy: falseon axios requests that must never use environment proxies. - Configure the proxy itself to reject
0.0.0.0, loopback, link-local, and internal address ranges.
<details>
<summary>Original Report</summary>
Summary
axios versions 1.15.0–1.16.1 contain an incomplete loopback-address check in lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js. The isLoopback() function correctly identifies 127.0.0.0/8 and ::1 as loopback addresses but does not recognise 0.0.0.0 — the IPv4 unspecified address, which routes to the local machine on Linux and macOS.
An attacker who controls a URL passed to axios can use http://0.0.0.0/<path> to bypass proxy-based SSRF filtering that the application relies upon.
Details
Affected versions
>= 1.15.0, <= 1.16.1
The vulnerability was introduced in v1.15.0 when the shouldBypassProxy helper was added as a security improvement (PR #
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity none, availability none.
Affected software
CVE-2026-67315 is recorded against 2 packages.
- axios
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 20 July 2026 and last revised on 2 August 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| axios | — | — |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1774225185
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1774225186
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1776904633
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1776991067
- Unknown CLSA-2026-1777855414
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Free Vulnerability Check
Is your site affected by CVE-2026-67315?
BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against CVE-2026-67315 and other known CVE records.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.