🛡️ CVE-2026-71311 — rclone
Description
rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines
1. Summary
A valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel. The dependency does not reject CR or LF in command arguments, so a filename can inject an independent authenticated command. A real test server observed the injected DELE command.
The default FTP encoding and the configuration-wizard examples include Ctl and are not vulnerable to the demonstrated filename. A manual custom encoding that omits Ctl/CrLf is mandatory and is reflected as High attack complexity. The credible trust boundary is a lower-trust source namespace feeding a more-privileged FTP destination: if the attacker already has equivalent rights on that destination, the report establishes a bug but no privilege gain. Protocol framing must still be enforced at the command sink because a filename-compatibility encoder is not a safe substitute for command-argument validation.
2. Affected Assets & Attack Surface
- Verified rclone revision:
a0c09f1381ae93e2a9a33c529d170186c61ad058(v1.74.0-240-ga0c09f138) - Current-master check: the relevant paths remained present at commit
961266888fe797390c535386f3b3aa46f4853602on 2026-07-18 - rclone FTP encoding:
backend/ftp/ftp.go:232-248,768-785 - Encoder masks/conversion:
lib/encoder/encoder.go:36-68,121-152,1144-1165 - FTP command sinks:
backend/ftp/ftp.go:1071-1173,1309-1428 - Dependency:
github.com/jlaffaye/[email protected] - Dependency command formatting:
ftp.go:604-610, with path-bearing callers atftp.go:893-947,1010-1026, and1069-1080 - Preconditions: an attacker can create a filename in a source namespace, the victim copies/syncs it to an FTP destination with greater authority, and that destination uses a manually configured encoding that leaves CR/LF raw
- Platform note: Unix and some remote backends can supply newline-bearing names; a local Windows source cannot create the demonstrated filename
3. Technical Root Cause Analysis
Rclone represents control characters safely in its internal Standard encoding. Immediately before an FTP operation, FromStandardPath decodes that representation and applies the configured backend mask. If the mask omits Ctl/CrLf, raw newlines are restored. The dependency then formats the resulting argument onto a CRLF-delimited control stream through textproto.Conn.Cmd without validating it. Reversible filename representation is therefore being used as the only protection for a protocol-command boundary.
4. Proof-of-Concept & Evidence
The source filename was equivalent to:
```text
victim\r\nDELE other-secret\r\nNOOP
```
With the default encoding, no raw newline reached the command. With the valid nondefault configuration encoding = Slash, FromStandardPath restored raw CRLF. During a real FTP path operation, the server parsed DELE other-secret as an independent authenticated command. This establishes injection, not merely unsafe serialization. The test did not establish confidentiality impact or operating-system command execution.
5. Impact Assessment
Injected commands run with the configured FTP account's permissions. Demonstrated direct impact is deletion of a different path, with corresponding integrity and availability loss inside that account. Other FTP filesystem commands may be reachable, but confidentiality and arbitrary operating-system command execution are not claimed. The privilege-boundary case requires the victim's FTP account to have more authority than the attacker has in the source namespace.
6. Remediation Guidance
- Reject CR and LF in every FTP command argument at the lowest command-construction boundary.
- Apply the check to paths, usernames, passwords, rename arguments, and all other formatted fields.
- Return an error rather than silently normalizing an unsafe argument.
- Keep the default encoder protection as defense in depth and reject an FTP encoding configuration that can restore CR/LF.
- Add end-to-end tests for CR, LF, CRLF, and each path command.
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. A user must be tricked into taking some action. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability high.
Affected software
CVE-2026-71311 is recorded against 2 packages.
- github.com/rclone/rclone
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 5 August 2026 and last revised on 10 August 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/rclone/rclone | — | — |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- High CVE-2026-71309
- Medium CVE-2026-71310
- Low GHSA-gwfq-86j8-7qhv
- High CVE-2026-71312
- Unknown GHSA-h4mf-4v27-hggj
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Vulnerability Monitoring
Track new vulnerabilities in rclone
CVE-2026-71311 is rated CVSS 6.4 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.
Set Up Free Alerts →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.