Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ GHSA-pg4w-g64p-qwhj — gitoxide

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-22 OSV
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

gix and gitoxide's symlinked .gitmodules are followed and parsed from outside of the repository

Summary

attachments:

[pocs.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/26431422/pocs.zip)

When Repository::submodules() loads submodule metadata, it prefers the worktree .gitmodules file if that path exists. In the current implementation, the path is read with std::fs::read(), which follows symlinks. As a result, a repository can present a symlinked .gitmodules that points outside the repository, and gitoxide will parse the out-of-repository bytes as submodule configuration.

This is a repository-boundary violation. A caller using the high-level submodule API can believe it is reading repository-local submodule metadata, while the bytes are actually coming from an arbitrary file outside the repository tree.

Root cause analysis

The relevant flow is:

1. [gix/src/repository/location.rs](https://github.com/GitoxideLabs/gitoxide/blob/v0.52.0/gix/src/repository/location.rs) derives the worktree .gitmodules path as workdir/.gitmodules.

2. [gix/src/repository/submodule.rs](https://github.com/GitoxideLabs/gitoxide/blob/v0.52.0/gix/src/repository/submodule.rs) reads that path with std::fs::read(&path) and immediately parses the bytes as a submodule configuration file.

3. Repository::submodules() exposes the parsed entries through the high-level API.

The issue is not in the parser. The issue is that the worktree path is treated as an ordinary file without checking whether it is a symlink, and without checking whether the canonicalized target remains inside the repository worktree.

Because std::fs::read() follows symlinks, a malicious repository can cause gitoxide to ingest bytes from an attacker-chosen location outside the repository. The resulting Submodule objects then expose name, path, and url values derived from that external file.

Reproduction steps

Use the attached PoC zip that contains the pocs/ workspace.

1. Unzip the PoC archive.

2. Enter pocs/F001.

3. Run:

```bash

cargo run --quiet

```

4. Compare the output with pocs/F001/result.txt.

Important outputs include:

  • gitmodules_symlink=.../victim-repo/.gitmodules
  • symlink_target=.../outside/modules.conf
  • parsed_name=symlinked
  • parsed_path=deps/symlinked
  • parsed_url=https://attacker.example/symlinked.git

These outputs show that gitoxide parsed the submodule configuration from the symlink target outside the repository, not from repository-local bytes.

Impact

Confirmed impact:

  • out-of-repository bytes can be injected into the result of Repository::submodules();
  • callers can be misled about submodule metadata such as name, path, and url;
  • any downstream workflow that uses those values to decide clone, fetch, update, or policy behavior is operating on attacker-controlled data that did not actually originate from the repository tree.

This report does not claim direct command execution from this code path by itself. The demonstrated impact is metadata injection across the repository boundary.

Recommended fix

A safe fix is to stop silently following symlinks for the worktree .gitmodules path in this loading path.

Reasonable options include:

1. use symlink_metadata() / lstatstyle checks and reject symlinked .gitmodules when loading from the worktree;

2. canonicalize the target and verify that it still resides under the repository worktree before reading it;

3. for security-sensitive callers, prefer loading .gitmodules from the index or HEAD tree rather than following the worktree path.

At minimum, the worktree path should not silently follow symlinks to arbitrary external files.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity none, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Attack requirements: None — no deployment-specific condition has to hold.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: None.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

GHSA-pg4w-g64p-qwhj is classified as CWE-22: Path Traversal. A file path built from user input is not confined to the intended directory, letting an attacker reach files elsewhere on the filesystem.

Affected software

GHSA-pg4w-g64p-qwhj is recorded against 2 packages.

  • gitoxide
  • gix

Timeline and source

Published on 5 May 2026 and last revised on 8 May 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)

Other advisories for this package

gitoxide has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-22: Path Traversal) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
CWE CWE-22
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-05-05
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-05-08
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
gitoxide — —
gix — —

Site Security Check

Is gitoxide part of your stack?

GHSA-pg4w-g64p-qwhj is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesGitHub AdvisoryGitHub Advisory Undated
✓