🛡️ CVE-2026-47394 — praisonai
Description
PraisonAI vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file read via MCP workflow.show, workflow.validate, deploy.validate
Summary
The fix for GHSA-9mqq-jqxf-grvw / CVE-2026-44336 is incomplete. The original advisory description named four vulnerable handlers in mcp_server/adapters/cli_tools.py:
> "registers four file-handling tools by default, praisonai.rules.create, praisonai.rules.show, praisonai.rules.delete, and praisonai.workflow.show. Each accepts a path or filename string from MCP tools/call arguments… with no containment check."
Commit 68cc9427 ("fix(security): harden MCP rules path handling…") added a _resolve_rule_path() helper and applied it to rules.create, rules.show, and rules.delete. workflow.show was left unchanged. Two adjacent handlers in the same file have the same pattern, workflow.validate and deploy.validate. Neither was mentioned in the original advisory. Both remain unchanged.
The original advisory also identified the dispatcher (server.py:281-298) as a root cause. It accepts unvalidated **kwargs from params["arguments"] with no enforcement against the tool's declared input_schema. That code is unchanged in HEAD as of commit 42221210.
Result: A single unauthenticated MCP tools/call to praisonai.workflow.show returns the contents of any file the host user can read: /etc/passwd, ~/.ssh/id_rsa, ~/.aws/credentials, or any project .env.
Affected functionality
src/praisonai/praisonai/mcp_server/adapters/cli_tools.py:
| Lines | Tool | Bug |
|-------|------|-----|
| 63-73 | praisonai.workflow.show | Returns the full contents of any file the host user can read |
| 42-61 | praisonai.workflow.validate | Reads any path; YAML parser error messages leak file existence + content fragments |
| 415-432 | praisonai.deploy.validate | Same pattern as workflow.validate. The config_path="deploy.yaml" default does not constrain the input. |
src/praisonai/praisonai/mcp_server/server.py:281-298, _handle_tools_call:
```python
async def _handle_tools_call(self, params: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
tool_name = params.get("name")
arguments = params.get("arguments", {})
...
tool = self._tool_registry.get(tool_name)
...
if asyncio.iscoroutinefunction(tool.handler):
result = await tool.handler(**arguments) # ← no schema enforcement
else:
result = tool.handler(**arguments)
```
Any JSON arguments the MCP client sends become a **kwargs call to the handler. The original advisory pointed at this code path as the root cause. The May 3 patch did not change it.
Default deployment is exposed
src/praisonai/praisonai/mcp_server/transports/http_stream.py:38-91:
hostdefaults to127.0.0.1, which is still reachable from any local process or container neighbour on loopback.api_keydefaults toNone. The auth check athttp_stream.py:192-198is gated onif self.api_key:, so it is skipped when no key is configured. There is no env var or config switch that turns auth on by default.- The same handlers are also reachable on the stdio transport, which is the exploitation model the original advisory was written around (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue.dev, Claude Code).
Other file-read sinks reachable via the same dispatcher
These were not named in the original advisory. They confirm the bug is dispatcher-wide and not limited to cli_tools.py:
mcp_server/adapters/capabilities.py:19-28,praisonai.audio.transcribe(file_path). Opens any host file and ships it to OpenAI Whisper.mcp_server/adapters/extended_capabilities.py:47-62,praisonai.files.create(file_path). Uploads any host file to OpenAI Files. A follow-up call topraisonai.files.content(file_id)(extended_capabilities.py:103-113) returns the bytes.mcp_server/adapters/extended_capabilities.py:243-258,praisonai.ocr_extract(image_path). Opens any image, returns OCR text.
The three handlers in cli_tools.py are the most direct primitives, since they echo the file content back without an OpenAI round-trip.
Proof of Concept
Layout
```
PraisonAI/
└── poc/
├── start_mcp_server.sh ← starts the real MCP server
├── run_mcp_poc_video.sh ← runs the attack with curl
├── venv/
└── output/
├── mcp_server_run.log
├── mcp_attacker_run.log
└── synthetic_credentials.txt (PoC-only fake creds)
```
[start_mcp_server.sh](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27569524/start_mcp_server.sh)
[run_mcp_poc_video.sh](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27569525/run_mcp_poc_video.sh)
The server starter runs the real MCPServer class with register_cli_tools(), same code path praisonai mcp serve --transport http-stream uses. No mocks.
How to reproduce
Terminal 1, start the server:
```bash
cd PraisonAI
bash poc/start_mcp_server.sh
```
Boots MCPServer on 127.0.0.1:8766/mcp with no auth, matchin
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity none, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-47394 is classified as CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information. Information that should stay internal is disclosed to someone who is not authorised to see it.
Affected software
CVE-2026-47394 is recorded against 2 packages.
- praisonai (fixed in 4.6.40)
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 29 May 2026 and last revised on 13 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
Details
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| praisonai | — | 4.6.40 |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Medium CVE-2026-40112
- High CVE-2026-40113
- High CVE-2026-40114
- Critical CVE-2026-39888
- High CVE-2026-39889
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is praisonai part of your stack?
CVE-2026-47394 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.