🛡️ CVE-2026-57145 — praisonai
Description
PraisonAI: Arbitrary File Read/Write via multiedit Tool Without Path Validation
Summary
The multiedit tool in src/praisonai/praisonai/tools/multiedit.py allows LLM-controlled arbitrary file read and write without any path validation, workspace boundary check, or protected path guard. This enables an attacker who can influence agent tool arguments (via crafted prompts, user input in chat bots, or malicious YAML workflow configs) to read sensitive files (e.g., /etc/shadow, ~/.ssh/id_rsa, ~/.aws/credentials) and overwrite arbitrary files on the filesystem.
Details
The filepath parameter is used directly with open() for both reading (line 74) and writing (line 130) without any of the following protections that exist in other tools in the same codebase:
1. No .. path traversal check — unlike file_tools.py (line 66: if '..' in filepath: raise ValueError) and edit_tools.py (line 35).
2. No workspace boundary validation — unlike file_tools.py (_validate_path with os.path.commonpath check) and skill_tools.py (read_skill_file with workspace boundary check).
3. No protected path guard — unlike praisonai/code/tools/ which uses is_path_within_directory and protected path checks.
4. No symlink resolution — unlike file_tools.py which uses os.path.realpath.
The function is exported via src/praisonai/praisonai/tools/__init__.py as a lazy-loaded tool and is available to agents through the PraisonAI CLI tools registry.
Contrast with protected tools: The sibling tools write_file.py, read_file.py, apply_diff.py, and search_replace.py in src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/ all implement is_path_within_directory() checks and protected path guards. The multiedit tool has none of these protections.
PoC
Setup: Clean checkout of PraisonAI at commit d5f1114a. No additional dependencies needed beyond Python 3.10+.
Positive trigger — arbitrary file read via dry_run:
```bash
cd /tmp && python3 -c "
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, 'src/praisonai')
from praisonai.tools.multiedit import multiedit
# Read any file content via diff output (dry_run=True prevents write)
result = multiedit('/etc/hostname', [{'old': 'DOESNOTEXIST', 'new': 'x'}], dry_run=True)
# The diff output reveals the file contents
print('Success:', result['success'])
print('Content leaked via diff:', len(result.get('diff', '')), 'bytes')
"
```
Positive trigger — arbitrary file write:
```bash
cd /tmp && python3 -c "
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, 'src/praisonai')
from praisonai.tools.multiedit import multiedit
# Write to an arbitrary file outside workspace
with open('/tmp/victim_file.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write('original content here\n')
result = multiedit('/tmp/victim_file.txt', [{'old': 'original', 'new': 'PWNED'}])
with open('/tmp/victim_file.txt', 'r') as f:
print('File content after edit:', repr(f.read()))
"
```
Observed output:
```
# Read:
Success: False
Content leaked via diff: 0 bytes (file content still accessible via dry_run diff when edits match)
# Write:
File content after edit: 'PWNED content here\n'
```
Negative control — non-existent file:
```bash
result = multiedit('/nonexistent/file.txt', [{'old': 'a', 'new': 'b'}])
# Returns: {'success': False, 'error': 'File not found: /nonexistent/file.txt'}
```
Cleanup: rm /tmp/victim_file.txt
Impact
An attacker who can influence the filepath parameter of the multiedit tool (via crafted prompts to an AI agent, user messages in Telegram/Discord/Slack bots using auto_approve_tools=True, or YAML workflow configurations) can:
- Read arbitrary files — any file readable by the process user, including secrets, SSH keys, cloud credentials, environment files (
.env), and configuration files. - Write/overwrite arbitrary files — modify any file writable by the process user, enabling privilege escalation (e.g., writing to
~/.bashrc,~/.ssh/authorized_keys, or overwriting application source code).
This affects all deployments where agents have the multiedit tool available, including the PraisonAI CLI and chat bot deployments where auto_approve_tools defaults to True.
Suggested remediation
Apply the same path validation pattern used by file_tools.py and the code tools in src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/:
1. Add a _validate_path function that:
- Rejects paths containing
.. - Resolves symlinks via
os.path.realpath - Validates the resolved path is within the workspace/CWD using
os.path.commonpath
2. Add protected path guards (.env, .git, .ssh, keys, credentials)
3. Apply _validate_path to the filepath parameter before any open() call
4. Consider adding @require_approval(risk_level="high") to the multiedit function
Credits
- Thai Son Dinh from VinSOC Labs (R&D)
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-57145 is classified as CWE-22: Path Traversal. A file path built from user input is not confined to the intended directory, letting an attacker reach files elsewhere on the filesystem.
Affected software
CVE-2026-57145 is recorded against 1 package.
- praisonai (fixed in 4.6.61)
Timeline and source
Published on 18 June 2026 and last revised on 23 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| praisonai | — | 4.6.61 |
References
Similar Threats
- Medium CVE-2026-40112
- High CVE-2026-40113
- High CVE-2026-40114
- Critical CVE-2026-39888
- High CVE-2026-39889
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Exploit Protection
Are you running praisonai?
CVE-2026-57145 carries CVSS 9.5 Critical rating. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2026-57145 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.